Before 1845, California’s Spanish/Mexican population numbered only a few thousand. But by 1849, during the gold rush, the non-Indian population of California had grown to 100,000. The Indian population was already weakened, suffering from disease, lack of food, and violent confrontations with the new landowners. Once the Americans arrived, California Indians were at a more significant disadvantage. With the lure of instant wealth in front of them, the new settlers wanted little to do with the Indians. The American approach to dealing with the Natives was summed up best by California historian Hubert Howe Bancroft:
“That part of the early intercourse between aboriginal Americans and Europeans which belongs to history may be briefly given; short work was made of it in California. The savages were in the way; the miners and settlers were arrogant and impatient; there were no missionaries or others present with even the poor pretense of soul saying or civilizing. It was one of the last human hunts of civilization and the basest and most brutal of them all.”
On the Americans’ arrival, the large ranchos were broken up, and the new, more numerous landowners on smaller parcels of land were less tolerant of Indians. The small ranchos were farmed and grazed more intensively, and this caused an even greater reduction in the Indians’ natural food supply. Jobs once belonging to Indians, especially skilled jobs, were taken by Whites.
We need only look at the California Legislature’s early record to understand the Americans’ relationship to the native population during this era. At the first State Constitutional Convention, those assembled voted to eliminate the Indians’ right to vote because they feared the control Indians might exercise.
In 1850, a law was enacted by the first session of the State Legislature, which set the tone for Indian-White relations to come.
Act for the Government and Protection of Indians
The act provided for the following:
- The Justice of the Peace would have jurisdiction over all complaints between Indians and Whites; “but in no case shall a white man be convicted of any offense upon the testimony of an Indian or Indians.”
- Landowners would permit Indians who were peaceably residing on their land to continue to do so.
- Whites would be able to obtain control of Indian children. (This section would eventually be used to justify and provide for Indian slavery.)
- If any Indian was convicted of a crime, any white person could come before the court and contract for the Indian’s services, and in return, would pay the Indian’s fine.
- It would be illegal to sell or administer alcohol to Indians.
- Indians convicted of stealing a horse, mule, cow, or any other valuable could receive any number of lashes not to exceed 25, and fines not to exceed $200. (It should be noted that the law provided that abusing an Indian child by whites was to be punished by no more than a $10 fine. It is hard to compare the penalty with the crime.)
- Finally, an Indian found strolling, loitering where alcohol was sold, begging, or leading a profligate course of life would be liable for arrest. The justice, mayor, or recorder would make out a warrant. Within 24 hours, the services of the Indian in question could be sold to the highest bidder. The term of service would not exceed four months.
This law was widely abused concerning the use of Indians as laborers, though it did allow Indians to reside on private land.
During 1851 and 1852, the California Legislature authorized payment of $1,100,000 for the “suppression of Indian hostilities.” Again, in 1857, the Legislature issued bonds for $410,000 for the same purpose. While theoretically attempting to resolve White-Indian conflicts, these payments only encouraged whites to form volunteer companies and try eliminating all the Indians in California.
In 1860, the law of 1850 was amended to state that Indian children and any vagrant Indian could be put under the custody of whites for employment and training. Under the law, it was possible to retain the service of Indians until 40 years of age for men and 35 years of age for women. This continued the practice of Indian slavery and made it legal for Indians to be retained for a more extended period and be taken at a younger age.
In 1862, the Alta California reported: “Little more than a hundred miles from San Francisco, in Mendocino County, the practice of Indian stealing is still extensively carried out. Only recently, George H. Woodman was caught near Ukiah with sixteen Indian children as he was about to take them out of the county for sale. It is well known that several men in that region have for years made it their profession to capture and sell unfortunate juveniles, the price ranging from $30 to $150 depending on their quality.”
This was not an isolated situation. U.S. Agent George Hanson reported: “A band of desperate men have carried on a system of kidnapping for two years past. Indian children were seized and carried into lower counties and sold into virtual slavery… The kidnappers follow at the heels of the soldiers to seize these children when their parents are murdered to sell them at the best advantage.” When there was no other way, there was “a class of whites who systematically killed adults to get their children.”
The other practice that provided much of the labor force, especially in southern California, was to have city officials pick up Indians as vagrants. These officials would then turn the Indians over to the ranchers and other people who needed laborers. This was all done under the provisions of the 1850 law. After four months or some other term of service, the employer would return the Indians to the city, usually to a place where alcohol was served. Shortly after their return, the Indians would be picked up again as vagrants and returned to the labor force.
These activities occurred until 1866 when the State Legislature repealed the law to comply with the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. The 14th Amendment provides that no state should infringe on any citizen’s “privileges or immunities,” nor “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law,” nor deny to any person “the equal protection of the law.”
While the state was enslaving and eliminating California natives, the federal government, in 1851, appointed three commissioners to negotiate treaties with California Indians. By 1852, 18 treaties had been negotiated with 139 tribes. The treaties were negotiated because the federal government perceived Indian tribes as foreign nations, and treaties were the legal means for developing an agreement and ensuring peace with them. The 18 treaties set aside 7,488,000 acres of land, or approximately one-third of California, for Indian use. This land settlement was similar to that negotiated with other tribes in other states. The treaties also provided funds for materials and food to allow the Indians to become self-sufficient. The treaties met with hostility in California. On January 16 and February 11, 1852, the State Senate concluded that the treaties “committed an error in assigning large portions of the richest mineral and agricultural lands to the Indians, who did not appreciate the land’s value.” The legislature instructed the United States senators from California to oppose the ratification of the treaties and called for the government to remove the Indians from the state as they had done in other states.
In February 1852, President Millard Fillmore submitted the 18 treaties to the United States Senate for ratification. The California senators were recognized, and the Senate went into a secret session to discuss the treaties. During this session, the Senate failed to ratify the treaties, and by order, they were placed in secret files, where they remained for the next 53 years. In 1871, the United States Congress declared it would no longer negotiate treaties with American Indians.
Although the United States Government failed to ratify the treaties, it did continue the policy of setting up reservations and moving the Indians to them. However, no attempt was made to negotiate new treaties. In 1852, while not acknowledging any claims of California Indians to the land, the United States appointed Edward F. Beale as the first Superintendent of Indian Affairs in California. Beale planned to establish five reserves on which the Indians would reside. Congress appropriated $250,000, and in September 1853, Beale gathered some 2,000 Indians and established the 50,000-acre Tejon Reserve. By focusing all his effort on Tejon, Beale neglected some 61,000 hungry natives. Beale declared that humanity must yield to necessity; they are not dangerous and must be neglected. In 1854, Beale was removed from his post. However, based on the information he acquired as superintendent, Beale eventually gained control of the reservation land.
Congress appointed Colonel Thomas J. Henley as the new superintendent in 1854. Following Beale’s original plan, Henley established the Nome Lackee Reservation; Nome Cult, Mendocino; Fresno Indian Farm; and Kings River Indian Farm. However, Henley did not act in the best interest of California Indians. The reservations suffered from a lack of water. Squatters grazed their cattle on unfenced land and destroyed crops that were being raised to support the Indians. Most of these squatters were business partners or relatives of Henley and, therefore, impossible to remove. It is important to note that these early reserves eventually left federal ownership, and the Indians who resided on them were once again forced to move to other lands to make new homes. Every time Indians were removed, the commissioners prospered.
In 1870, in an attempt to get away from corrupt superintendents and to convert the Indians to Christianity, the federal government turned over the operation of the reservations to the Quaker Church. In California, the Methodists, Baptists, and other churches eventually took on the management of the reservations. While the new management was not corrupt and was far better for the general welfare of the Indians, the church was less tolerant of Indians continuing their traditional beliefs. Thus, the reservations became missions and the first tools under American control to assimilate Indians into the general population. Once again, California Indians were confronted with change and forced to adapt from being prisoners of war to being wards of the church.
The 1870s saw two other important events in California Indian history. The first event centered on a Nevada Indian prophet who proclaimed that the end of the world was near. The most consistent manifestation of this resurgence of native religion was the belief the end of the world was near and that the dead would return with the disappearance of the whites. Part of the effort in the attempt to eliminate the whites was to sing and dance the traditional songs. While the prophet’s dreams were never realized, the Ghost Dance, as it was called, spread throughout much of California. While the return to religious activities did not result in the return of the dead, it did encourage traditional activities among the California Indians. The second event was the Modoc War of 1872-73. A group of Modoc Indians, led by Captain Jack, fought the United States Army from a lava bed stronghold. Even though the Modocs were greatly outnumbered, the army took over a year to squash the rebellion. This was the last armed resistance by California Indians.
In 1872, the California Constitution was amended to allow Indians to testify in courts of law. Up to this point, “his testimony was not admissible in evidence. Not being a reservation Indian, he could not appeal to the United States courts, and, [was] ignored by both State and Nation. . . .”
In summary, this period saw the establishment of California as a state. With statehood, laws were passed that infringed on the rights of Indian people to occupy their homelands and caused them to be used much like slaves. It was not until the enactment of the 14th Amendment that these rights were restored. Treaties were negotiated and rejected; reservations established, dissolved, and reinstated; and Indians were still in a period of unrest.